Merlin, representing independent music companies, has strongly opposed the UK's proposed AI training law that would allow AI developers to train models on copyrighted works without permission. The organization warns this could cause over $200 million in annual damages to independent artists through lost revenue.

Jeremy Sirota, Merlin's CEO, emphasized that independent music shouldn't be exploited without consent by tech companies, stating that "AI should be additive, not a tool for devaluing human artistry."

Key concerns raised by Merlin:

• The law would benefit AI developers at the expense of rightsholders
• Creators would bear the burden of opting out rather than AI companies seeking permission
• The proposal threatens intellectual property rights and creative value

Merlin advocates for:

• Mandatory prior permission from rightsholders for AI training
• Disclosure of materials already used in AI model training
• Stronger copyright protections instead of reduced rights

Other industry leaders joining the opposition include:

• Major record labels
• Association of Independent Music (AIM)
• Independent Music Publishers' E-Licensing (IMPEL)
• Independent Music Publishers International Forum (IMPF)

Sarah Williams, IMPEL CEO, called the proposed law "a huge misstep," while IMPF President Annette Barrett warned it represents an "existential threat to IP in the UK." The Make It Fair campaign, supported by numerous music industry stakeholders, continues to push for stronger protections for creators and their work.

Recent reports suggest the UK government may revise its approach to AI training regulations, following widespread industry opposition and concerns about protecting creative rights.

Related Articles

Previous Articles