Major record labels and indie sector representatives are strongly opposing a UK government proposal that would allow AI companies to train their models on copyrighted works without explicit permission from rightsholders.

Universal Music's Lucian Grainge, Sony Music's Rob Stringer, and Warner Music's Robert Kyncl have voiced serious concerns about the controversial framework, which would implement an opt-out system for copyright holders rather than requiring explicit consent for AI training.

Key Concerns:

• The proposal threatens intellectual property rights and music monetization
• An opt-out system places undue burden on smaller players and independents
• The measure could compromise the UK's position as a leader in creative industries

Gee Davy, CEO of the Association of Independent Music (AIM), warns that this exception would "put Britain in a race to the bottom." She emphasizes that while independent music businesses embrace AI innovation, it shouldn't come at the expense of musicians' livelihoods.

Industry leaders propose:

• Automatic training safeguards for creators instead of an opt-out system
• Amendments to the UK's Data Bill to strengthen copyright protections
• Development of frameworks that benefit both AI developers and music creators

The campaign against the proposal has gained support from prominent artists including Paul McCartney and Elton John, along with various organizations and lawmakers. The consultation period for the proposal ended on February 25th, with the final decision pending.

The UK government's initiative aims to attract AI investment and "deliver a decade of national renewal," according to Prime Minister Keir Starmer. However, industry leaders argue that proper copyright protections are essential for sustaining the creative sector while embracing technological advancement.

Related Articles

Previous Articles