A federal judge has denied Live Nation's motion to dismiss the antitrust lawsuit filed by the Justice Department and 30 state attorneys general, allowing the case to proceed. The lawsuit centers on allegations of monopolistic control over performance venues across the United States.

Photo Credit: Taylor Swift by Paolo Villanueva / CC by 2.0

US District Judge Arun Subramanian found sufficient evidence for "tying" claims, where Live Nation allegedly requires artists to use their concert-promotion services to access Live Nation-operated venues. The company currently controls approximately 80% of primary ticketing at major concert venues and maintains a 70% share in large amphitheater productions.

While Live Nation argued that artists can work with rival promoters who rent venues, Judge Subramanian asserted that the company's policies effectively prevent artists from working with their chosen promoters if they want to perform at Live Nation-owned or controlled venues.

The judge stated that if evidence shows promoters book venues on behalf of specific artists, and artists are coerced into using Live Nation as their promoter to access venues, plaintiffs may have a viable tying claim. The case specifically addresses how Live Nation's practices affect artists' ability to freely choose their promoters while accessing major performance venues.

The Justice Department's lawsuit marks a significant challenge to Live Nation's dominant position in the live entertainment industry, where it has become the largest promoter of national amphitheater tours. The court's decision to allow the case to proceed represents a crucial step in examining potential anticompetitive practices in the live entertainment sector.

Related Articles

Previous Articles